A Collaboration with University of Pittsburgh   

Waterboarding evidence may be admissible in Guantanamo trials: legal advisor

[JURIST] The legal advisor to the Convening Authority [official backgrounder] for Military Commissions at Guantanamo Bay testified before members of Congress [text] Tuesday that evidence gathered from interrogation techniques such as waterboarding [JURIST news archive] may be admissible during military commission proceedings if it is "reliable and probative." Speaking before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology and Homeland Security, Air Force Brig. Gen. Thomas W.Hartmann [official profile] declined to answer senators' questions regarding whether waterboarding is illegal when used by or against Americans.

Hartmann's testimony came a day after retired CIA agent John Kiriakou confirmed the use of waterboarding [JURIST report] during the interrogation of top al Qaeda suspect Abu Zubaydah [BBC profile]. Kiriakou said that the tactic's efficacy in helping to disrupt "a number of attacks, maybe dozens" outweighed its harshness. An upcoming intelligence funding bill [JURIST report] reportedly aims to restrict CIA interrogators to using only those interrogation techniques explicitly authorized by the 2006 Army Field Manual. The Washington Post has more.

Support JURIST

We rely on our readers to keep JURIST running

 Donate now!

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.