A Collaboration with University of Pittsburgh   

China adopts strict new rules on internet providers and users

China adopted new rules on Friday which impose new restrictions [Xinhua report] on the country's Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and individual users. The rules, called the Decision to Strengthen the Protection of Online Information, were adopted by China's highest legislative body, the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) [official website], after one reading and without any public consultation. The decision by the NPCSC includes provisions requiring that all land-line phone, mobile phone, and Internet service contracts are provided only to people who give their real names to their providers and it imposes an obligation on the ISPs to monitor, delete, and report to the government any online content the ISP determines is illegal. While many critics fear that the new push will stifle online speech [South China Morning Post report], the decision's text claims that the new rule will "ensure Internet information security, safeguard the lawful rights and interests of citizens, legal entities or other organizations and safeguard national security and social public interests."

China has faced criticism for its policy of strict Internet regulation. In July the government suggested rules that would limit anonymous posting online [JURIST report]. In 2010, the State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China [official website, in Chinese] released a position paper [JURIST report] on the country's human rights record, claiming that it has heightened Internet freedoms and improved civil and political rights. In July of that year, Chinese Internet regulators planned to drastically reduce Internet anonymity [JURIST report] by requiring people to use their real names when posting on certain Chinese websites, according to Human Rights in China (HRIC) [advocacy website]. HRIC's revelation came on the heels of a June announcement that Google would continue to operate its google.cn Internet search engine in mainland China, ending a four-month period during which the site simply redirected to the uncensored google.hk [search websites; JURIST report] after the company threatened in January to pull out of China entirely [JURIST report]. Earlier that month, the Chinese government defended [JURIST report] its Internet censorship laws in a report on Internet usage in the country.

Support JURIST

We rely on our readers to keep JURIST running

 Donate now!

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.